A- de 1996
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
✓Claimant Sepulveda Escobar Yamile·Respondent Blanca Cruz
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Iniciación de la acción y fallo
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se decretó la nulidad de la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado de la referencia debido a que se omitió notificarle la iniciación de las correspondientes actuaciones a una de las partes o intervinientes.
En consideración, ordenó devolver el expediente al mencionado Juzgado para que, previa notificación de la demanda surta nuevamente la primera instancia de la acción de tutela.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- Primero. DECRETAR la nulidad de la sentencia de fecha dieciocho (18) de julio de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996), proferida por el Juzgado
- Quinto. de Familia de Santafe de Bogota.
- Segundo. ORDENAR que por Secretaria se devuelva el expediente al Juzgado
- Quinto. de Familia de Santafe de Bogota, para que, previa notificacion de la demanda a la Sociedad Cruz Blanca EPS S.A., surta nuevamente la primera instancia de la accion de tutela.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.